Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center for Service & Social Action


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to John Carroll University. Spartaz Humbug! 08:12, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Center for Service & Social Action

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG, promo. Just an service of John Carroll University with no independent notability. The Banner talk 23:52, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:19, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 01:19, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: There is a strong consensus that this article should not be kept. However there are specific disagreements about merge/redirect/delete, warranting additional discussion
 * Delete this is an overtly promotional article for a minor, non-notable religious center (or should we call it a service?), sourced largely by its own web site. I removed the paragraph talking about the $2500 in internal awards they distribute, which pretty much tells you what you need to know: this is a small non-notable org. I don't think it even deserves a redirect.96.127.243.251 (talk) 03:29, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge into John Carroll university as not independently notable, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 11:00, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG. No significant coverage by independent reliable sources is found. — Cactus Writer (talk) 16:12, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to John Carroll University, which has a single sentence on the centre. I haven't been able to find any coverage in independent reliable sources, and I don't see much value in merging the article content into the university's article, but so long as there's a summary there then a redirect is useful. – Arms &amp; Hearts (talk) 23:12, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect as per Arms and Hearts. Dom from Paris (talk) 09:01, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 17:54, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to John Carroll University, which adequately describes the center and its purpose in a more notable context without needing any details from this article. Bakazaka (talk) 20:19, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to John Carroll University - the article does not meet any of the relevant notability guidelines, but redirecting makes more sense to me than deleting. There's a sentence about this there already, and I don't think it needs any more than that, meaning that further merge wouldn't be necessary.-- SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 01:50, 29 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.