Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center for Studies and Research in Aeronautical Medicine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus  defaulting to keep. Jclemens (talk) 06:27, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Center for Studies and Research in Aeronautical Medicine

 * &mdash; duplicate created by the original creator after this AFD discussion began
 * &mdash; duplicate created by the original creator after this AFD discussion began

As I said here, I can find documentation of a Centro Ricerche Aerospaziali (Centre for Aerospatial Research) in Guidonia, but no documentation for this. I can find no sources that document the subject, let alone that support this content. Indeed, I can find sources that outright contradict this content, such as ISBN 9782701015187 page 233 which describes a "short lived" (1935–1943) Centre for Aeronautical Research in Guidonia that was a collaboration between the Aeronautica Militare and Sapienza University of Rome, not the University of Turin, and that was not specifically a centre for research in aeronautical medicine. Mario Pezzi, similarly, was at the Centro Sperimentale at Guidonia (source) and not at this purported organization. The 1963 "special school" associated with the University of Rome is, in fact, the Associazione Italiana di Medicina Aeronautica E Spaziale, which is not a "special school", and not this purported organization. The content here is unverifiable and I can find no subject by this name. Uncle G (talk) 20:10, 6 July 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:07, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:07, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.