Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center for positive aging in lower merion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 05:06, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Center for positive aging in lower merion

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Local service center for the aging, no signs of notability for WP:GNG, no coverage beyond community info resources. Largoplazo (talk) 04:11, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:13, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:13, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:48, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment this center is most often called PALM and there are more sources available when searching PALM Lower Merion instead of Center for positive aging in Lower Merion. 🔯 Sir Joseph 🍸 (talk) 14:38, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * FWIW I didn't restrict the search that fully. I searched for . Granted, I didn't search for PALM. Largoplazo (talk) 15:06, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Now I've run several searches on PALM and "Upper Merion", variously excluding set phrases like "palm beach" or including (aging OR senior), and, except for a couple of articles in one area publication, Main Line Times, I couldn't find anything but event calendar entries and community resource listings. Largoplazo (talk) 15:16, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * (Lower Merion), I think the second link might be a small notable entry. It's an article on how the PALM is celebrating their anniversary and goes into what the PALM does. 🔯 Sir Joseph 🍸 (talk) 20:26, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can neither see nor find any evidence of notability for this centre. Fails WP:GNG.  Velella  Velella Talk 03:36, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:23, 19 December 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:02, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- this content belongs on the org's web site, not here. WP:PROMO applies. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:28, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is a small, local social service agency that services not more than 1,000 people annually. How is that notable? Bearian (talk) 18:45, 31 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.