Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center for the Advancement of Capitalism

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. &mdash; Sesel wa  18:59, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Center for the Advancement of Capitalism

 * Delete. Non-notable think tank. Firebug 03:52, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I first thought to keep because it said it had entries in both Wikiquote and Wikisource, then I realised there were none. Plus, the name is misleading in itself, advancing "capitalism" doesn't mean advancing individual rights. -- Natalinasmpf 03:56, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep: Google returns >4,000 hits. Seems notable enough, and there's plenty in Wikipedia that is less notable. The name of the organization is real. --Durin 03:57, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable organization from the objectivist movement.  ElBenevolente 04:36, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've seen them quoted as a source from time to time. Feco 05:31, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable enough for mine. Capitalistroadster 06:11, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Established think tank. Nothing misleading in the name. jni 11:27, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Claim that ""capitalism" doesn't mean advancing individual rights" is without merit; Objectivist thought, which this group represents, explicitly recognizes the connection between the principle of individual rights and capitalism as a social system. See "Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal" by Ayn Rand. Principals have appeared on Politically Incorrect with Bill Maher, NPR's Justice Talking, C-SPAN, represented Objectivist position on antitrust re: US v. Microsoft, opinion part of DOJ's "major comments" list (under former name of "Center for the Moral Defense of Capitalism") 69.170.17.193 19:01, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Claim that ""capitalism" doesn't mean advancing individual rights" reflects non-NPOV. Claimant's webpage indicates claimant is a minor child. A1Capitalist 05:09, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) *** User's first edit, inexplicably enough, since the article prospects for deletion are slim. El_C 03:20, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Quit age-baiting! I've been through it before and no one should have to experience it on Wikipedia. Judge by contributions and ideas, not by groups of 365 days. — Sesel wa  22:49, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.