Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center for the Study of Christianity & Justice


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:00, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Center for the Study of Christianity & Justice

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promo. Fails WP:GNG, largely based on related sources, including a blacklisted one. The Banner talk 14:54, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:38, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:38, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:09, 6 September 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete I removed numerous bogus sources used to puff up the article. What remains are two or three few decent sources. The main reason to delete here is that he article is the deeply flawed product of the promotional editor of Jesuit articles Jzsj, who has here, as he did in literally hundreds of articles, used the thinnest of sources (library indexes, books for sale web pages, minor or passing mentions in other Jesuit publications etc) to concoct a promotional article that is very difficult to assess. In short, this NPOV-lacking garbage needs to go. I would be OK with sending it to draft, if someone is of the mind to spend hours fixing it. I'm not. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 03:00, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 01:33, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete The article fails WP:GNG because sources do not demonstrate that the organization is notable enough in any WP:SIGCOV kind of way. The article is also highly promotional of the organization and does not seem to meet WP:NPOV. Newshunter12 (talk) 09:38, 22 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.