Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centon Electronics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 19:43, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Centon Electronics

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company, I can't even find one good reference to help improve the article. Multiple searches through Google News, Books, newspapers and browser found nothing as shown here, here, here and here (mostly press releases). It actually seems that some of the most attention they got was a theft of millions of dollars of computer chips in 1995. I attempted several searches with the MLB, NASCAR, etc. partnerships but found nothing. SwisterTwister  talk  05:35, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:58, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:58, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:58, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete. I agree with ST, above. This firm is not WP:Notable. The theft of computer chips, though, could make an interesting article, per all these other articles about the phenomenon. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 06:33, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:57, 28 April 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:37, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete expanding the coverage of the company into articles on the company and its principals is excessive coverage. If their careers other than with respect to the company do not demonstrate notability. And for that matter, the company article needs a check to see if it can be worded less promotionally  DGG ( talk ) 04:33, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.