Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CentralPlaza Rattanathibet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Black Kite (talk) 12:10, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

CentralPlaza Rattanathibet

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

DePRODed because; ''Rmv PROD. Since another related article is being contested at AfD, that should probably be the proper venue for this article as well.'' Article is also promotional, (opening times, car parks, buses, etc) and was created and/or mostly edited by a shareholder in the company. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:58, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as original PRODder. Fails WP:ORG; advertising; conflict of interest. The same user's created quite a few other articles, perhaps a mass AfD is necessary? – Arms &amp; Hearts (talk) 18:04, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:06, 22 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge – Unlike CentralFestival Chiang Mai, the other article currently nominated for deletion, this article is about a shopping mall which has been in operation for over twenty years, and is cited to multiple secondary sources, which I think convey notability. That said, as part of a chain I do feel there is less incentive to have individual articles for each shopping centre bearing the name, and won't oppose merging all CentralPlaza articles into a single article with a list of branches (or subsections covering each branch). --Paul_012 (talk) 07:08, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep – Original was notability topic right why you change to topic again? That's why I bothered to find and include the secondary sources and I am currently finding more informations. Not promotion or adverts news. – AnaTo (talk) 10:59, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Dear mr. kudpung
 * All your accused subjects which I copied from other shopping mall stub template, all the subjects can easily be removed and don't have to delete article, just discuss in talk page.

It would be too long to merge all shopping malls in to main article and I wish to add all history for each shopping mall if i could find from source. AnaTo (talk) 10:58, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment – notability sources AnaTo (talk) 10:59, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Old news archive (paid only) http://allsearch.myfirstinfo.com/cgi-bin/mngnewssearch2?q=%E0%AB%E7%B9%B7%C3%D1%C5+%C3%D1%B5%B9%D2%B8%D4%E0%BA%C8%C3%EC&t=8&x=75&y=10
 * Weak keep, mainly because the issues raised in the nomination can be addressed by normal editing. The article doesn't read as unduly promotional, and unless the author is a very large shareholder, any COI would be pretty attenuated IMO. The sourcing I can read is a bit soft on notability, so I have to AGF here as I can't read Tai. I do think that fact this is part of a notable chain helps here, and I too would have no objection to a merge. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  14:26, 1 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak keep per WP:PRODUCT. This is an existing centre which was acquired and added to Central Pattana's business assets. I can't read Thai either, but the sources appear to indicate it's probably notable. IMO the sections entitled 'Operation Hours' and 'Parking' should be removed per WP:INDISCRIMINATE and WP:UNDUE. -- Trevj (talk) 09:10, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.