Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central 23


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 04:30, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Central 23

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet GNG or NORG. Sources are all interviews, lists of products, or do not mention Central 23. No RS found during BEFORE search. StartGrammarTime (talk) 05:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and United Kingdom. StartGrammarTime (talk) 05:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Delete I'm not finding any significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Some of the sources in the article don't even mention the company and others barely mention it. — Iadmc  ♫ talk  05:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and England.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  07:54, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - This is another one where on its face it appears to be notable. However, applying WP:SIRS shows that WP:ORGCRIT is not met. Examples include this and this which are in-depth, but the information is supplied by the founders so there is no real independence of the topic. The main reference that is a claim for notability is the same as the others. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:23, 10 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.