Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central Asia Health Review


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Maxim  ( ☎ )  19:20, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Central Asia Health Review

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Badly-garbled "article" about a non-notable online magazine which, when searched for with Google '-wikipedia' only comes up with 6 hits:. This article has already been deleted once via a prod, but the recreation indicates an objection to a prod, so it can't be speedy deleted now. But read this thing. Everything but the first and the last sentence is just... nothing. Corvus cornix talk  21:21, 28 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. When reading through it, hardly anything makes sense. Poor grammar is a feature throughout. Also coupled by the damning lack of references and citations, you may as well remove all the text and replace with the words, "Delete me."  A Prodigy   ~In Pursuit of Perfection ~ 21:45, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not a good sign of notability when you can't find an on-line magazine, um, on-line. Body of article is incohernt nonsense. ~ Ningauble (talk) 22:38, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Ninguable.  Lady   Galaxy  22:52, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above: no verifiability, body of article is nonsense. Cliff smith  talk  23:19, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Userfy. The article's clearly a work-in-progress, which is why there are those ellipses and so much of it makes little sense.  We have no way of verifying notability, so it clearly doesn't belong in the main body of Wikipedia, but deletion recommendations fail WP:DEMOLISH and WP:POTENTIAL.-- S Marshall   Talk / Cont  02:09, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Only six hits, most of them just lists of publications, doesn't inspire confidence. And it's not a work in progress, it was already here in June and PROD deleted.  You can see the original version at http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Central-Asia-Health-Review  Corvus cornix  talk  18:42, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - no reliable sources to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 13:02, 29 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.