Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central Broadcast News


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 20:04, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Central Broadcast News

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This was originally tagged but I thought I would bring it here because the article has been around for a few months. In my opinion the article does not show that the station is notable outside of the school, so it should be deleted. ... disco spinster  talk  22:17, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 22:40, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete High school CCTV channels are rarely notable, and this isn't an exception. Only independent reliable source I could find was a passing mention here. Shubinator (talk) 00:06, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable student club. Hairhorn (talk) 19:24, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I am the author of this article and I take great exception, albeit in a respectful manner, to the points made that the organization being discussed is insignificant. While this might appear this way to the individuals who nominated the page for speedy deletion, the organization is currently in talks with Apple and several various other tech/media companies to enter a partnership beginning this coming year. I assure you this organization is significant, and within a few months, it will become evident as to why as more notoriety is established within the broadcast media community. Please hold off on the deletion of this article as it does contribute positively to the Wikipedia community. Kw2957 (talk)
 * Are there reliable sources describing these talks? If CBN has not been covered by independent, reliable sources, it does not meet our notability guideline. When it does get significant coverage, the article can be created. Shubinator (talk) 23:56, 12 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep, but pending. Author appears genuine in his appeal and it is advisable to keep the article up for a few months to see if such talks allow for greater notability. Deleting the article now would make no sense seeing as the future of this group appears bright. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.227.153.76 (talk) 06:22, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:N. Any speculation on future notability fails WP:CRYSTAL. An admin can restore the article when and if the club becomes notable; alternatively, userfication may be appropriate here. Tim Song (talk) 13:09, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.