Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central European Diabetes Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 01:09, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Central European Diabetes Association

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I was unable to find non-trivial coverage in independent sources about this organisation. Biruitorul Talk 16:23, 25 September 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:33, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete For an international scientific/medical organization which has met for many years, it is surprising that I cannot find them mentioned more than once at Google Books or Google Scholar. Having several names in different languages might mean that they show up under one of the names but not the ones I tried. The article is largely a cut and paste from their website, and would need stubbing or rewriting in any event, but some source other than their website is needed to satisfy WP:notability. Subject to change if someone can find multiple reliable and independent sources with significant coverage. Edison (talk) 16:43, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   06:06, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:34, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep -- I suspect that the lack of Ghits is because any WP:RS on the subject will be in German or other Central European languages, not English. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:56, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * See WP:BURDEN - reliable sources actually have to be presented, and speculation that they might exist is not a valid substitute for including those sources. - Biruitorul Talk 20:41, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete, and I searched by "Zentraleuropäischen Diabetesgesellschaft" also, nothing much. Abductive  (reasoning) 07:24, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. The only source I could find (by searching for lots of permutations of names and abbreviations in both English and German) that may be more than a passing mention, or a citation to one of this organisation's symposia, is this article in a peer-reviewed journal, but I don't have access to the full text. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:12, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Edison and Phil Bridger. Surprising, though. Glass  Cobra  16:47, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.