Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central Unified School District 2006-2007 school year calendar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 14:38, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Central Unified School District 2006-2007 school year calendar
unencyclopedic schoolcruft – ugen64 23:58, 23 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. A school district is notable; its calendar is not.  WP:NOT a list of unencyclopedic current events. -- Kinu  t /c  00:13, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: The creator of this page, User:Jose and Ricardo, has been creating many pointless redirect articles (i.e., As of 7 to 7). WP:AGF, but some of those probably need to go as nonsensical and implausible. -- Kinu t /c  00:43, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge content into the Central Unified School District article and delete. The district's article is low on content as it is; I think there are more red words than black or blue there. —C.Fred (talk) 00:18, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete cruft.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 00:27, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Bucketsofg 01:08, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge. No reason to delete edit history, low likelihood of page being recreated repeatedly, so I see no reason to vote delete? Merge is just as good. Into Central Unified School District. -- cmh 01:17, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination and WP:NOT. As a second choice which would be just as acceptable to me, redirect to Central Unified School District with no merge. When I was a kid, my school would send out an academic calendar on a single sheet of paper which my mom taped to the inside of the kitchen cabinet, but nobody tried to get the school calendar published in the World Book Encyclopedia. --Metropolitan90 03:03, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:NOT as cited above. There is no reason to redirect; nobody's going to be searching for this specific phrase. --Hyphen5 04:45, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seems about as useful as Floor plan of Vincent Hall, University of Minnesota would be, and nobody has started that particular article yet.  -- E lkman - (talk) 04:53, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, do not merge. This is unencyclopedic and much better handled by the school district's website. Sjakkalle (Check!)  07:30, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and do not redirect per Hyphen, Elkman, and Sjakkalle (now that Elkman used Floor plan of Vincent Hall, University of Minnesota to illustrate a point, how long will it be 'til someone does create that article??). Joe 18:36, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, utterly unencyclopedic bullshit, do not merge, do not redirect, do not link to the deleted revisions. Do not BJAODN it either, lest it be reposted at some other random title. — Mar. 29, '06 [07:13] <[ freakofnurxture]|[ talk]>
 * Delete, not worthy of an encyclopaedia entry. Do not merge. --Soumyasch 07:21, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, not worthy of an encyclopaedia entry. Do not merge. --Soumyasch 07:21, 29 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.