Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central media


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 17:39, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Central media

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Vague concept/neologism as defined by one weak source; fails WP:GNG  —Мандичка YO 😜 07:12, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Not enough significant coverage. Turns up in just a few results on Google Books; one provides quite a bit of coverage, another occasionally mentions it, and the third only gives it a passing mention. APerson (talk!) 13:25, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete:- per lack of significant coverages in multiple independent reliable sources. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 07:59, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. This looks like a bit of synthesis/essay based on minor and limited usage of the term, and it's not supported as a generally-used term by significant coverage in reliable sources. (See also Lateral media by the same author, which reads as even more of a personal essay, and which I think should also be nominated for deletion). Mr Potto (talk) 13:24, 19 May 2015 (UTC) (I've now nominated Lateral media, at Articles for deletion/Lateral media. Mr Potto (talk) 13:32, 19 May 2015 (UTC))
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.