Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central square Leeds


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 05:56, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Central square Leeds

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability. Subject appears to fail both GNG and GEOFEAT. No sources are cited. A Google did not yield anything that rings the notability bell. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:23, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOFEAT. Not even built yet which likely explains why it fails. SW3 5DL (talk) 21:59, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 13 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. The site has been a hole in the ground since 2005, so glad to see the hole is being filled, it has only taken 9 years! Used to live down the road and missus worked opposite the hole. Nothing notable about this building unless you want to count hole filling. Szzuk (talk) 07:40, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability at this time; maybe after it opens it will get some coverage. Not a good candidate for redirect; the article isn't even titled correctly (needs capital S). Better to blow it up now, and start over if it becomes notable later.--MelanieN (talk) 23:53, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.