Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centre for Co-operation in Science and Technology among Developing Societies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 01:47, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Centre for Co-operation in Science and Technology among Developing Societies

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I cannot find enough in-depth, independent coverage about this organization to verify the information in this article. I only found some scattered references. The link to the website is dead. This, added to the already existent issues, prompts me request a deletion discussion. Either someone comes up with a couple of useful references to improve the article or else it should be deleted. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 01:41, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 01:41, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Science,  and Technology. Skynxnex (talk) 01:53, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
 * DELETE per nom. I also looked for reliable sources and only found a trickle of mentions.  Pepper Beast    (talk)  17:46, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, the coverage I could find consisted of a series of directory listings that do not provide WP:SIGCOV. The only other thing out there is this document, which is a primary source as it was made by the India Science and Research Fellowship, the non-notable organisation that established the CCSTDS. Devonian Wombat (talk) 01:19, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just not seeing WP:SIGCOV here. Seems to be a run of the mill non-notable research group in terms of sources. Even with my scientist hat on, I'm not seeing anything mentioned that would give me a caution flag indicating there may be sources showing something notable in terms of programs they do. KoA (talk) 16:50, 14 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.