Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Three relistings. no consensnus. Time to close this, feel free to bring it back after a spell Courcelles 00:55, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Based on this organization's stated goals and missions, it should be notable, but I can find no coverage in independent sources to draw on. The organization has placed itself on lots of other websites -- memberships in other international organizations, listings in various directories, etc., but no independent significant coverage of their activities. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:54, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 18:08, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 18:08, 20 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - Google News archives found several results and the links including this one and this one suggest they are most active in Africa, Asia and Latin America. I'm not an expert with this subject but it seems they may be notable. SwisterTwister   talk  23:57, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. If people are using Google to judge notability then I wish they would use the searches most likely to find reliable sources, i.e. start with Scholar, then go to Books, News archive and only as a desperate last resort use a general web search. By following such a common-sense strategy I found two cast-iron reliable sources within a minute: and ISBN 9780313375774 pp. 114–116 et al., but they are only the tip of the iceberg of readily available reliable sources. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:18, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. I used to live and work in Geneva and the Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue is a place I frequently visited for discussions, and workshops related to humanitarian practice. So it's definitely real and relevant. Regarding reliable sources, you can find their publications quoted on Swisspeace.ch and here. When you Google the name of these publications you'll see that they are being quoted and used by many humanitarian organizations. Timoluege (talk) 18:31, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:04, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:55, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:10, 11 January 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.