Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centre for Justice and Faith


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. is cautioned to check for sourcing and notability WP:BEFORE coming here, and is asked to stop stalking 's edits (lest they be viewed as having a personal agenda against them). &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 18:41, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Centre for Justice and Faith

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable organization, refs are largely self-published. Ref search does not turn up enough to support WP:ORG. Withdrawn, language confusion. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 23:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * well known in Quebec as the publisher of Revue Relations - best try to find it in French. It is not a coincidence that it was created on French Wikipedia before English Wikipedia. Pjposullivan (talk) 23:34, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Also it was in Le Devoir - which I will go as far to say is one of the most influential newspapers in Quebec. No one gets a profile piece in Le Devoir for not being notable. Must admit, kind of surprised this is up for deletion. Pjposullivan (talk) 23:38, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I live in Montreal and have never heard of it. If there are sources, let's add them. I will have another look.HappyValleyEditor (talk) 23:56, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The references I've added, are in French, so may not have turned up on the original ref search. For me, the UQAM and Le Devoir refs, are reliable independent secondary irreligious non-trivial sources that focus specifically on the centre (they are not mentions in passing). Pjposullivan (talk) 23:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Excellent, I will WITHDRAW the AfD. I'm also going to rename the page to "Centre de Justice et foi", which is the actual name of the place.HappyValleyEditor (talk) 00:01, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Good idea about the renaming thing, I should have done it a while back. Sorry, for the 'I'm surprised' comment earlier, I see that you're dealing with the spate of poorly-sourced Jesuit-linked articles. Good luck with sorting them out. Pjposullivan (talk) 01:13, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
 * no worries at all... I should probably start reading Le Devoir. Are you saying that if someone is in Le Devoir once or twice, they're notable? I was in it twice, in significant mentions! Hahahah. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 01:59, 25 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.