Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centre for Social Development and Self-Help Perspective


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:06, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Centre for Social Development and Self-Help Perspective

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

My searches (News, Books, browser, Scholar, highbeam and thefreelibrary) all found no good results to suggest possible improvement and the German article also provides no help. The article isn't detailed and more clear about this organization and maybe it's the language and country barriers but I found nothing to suggest keeping. SwisterTwister  talk  20:10, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 20:28, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 20:28, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 23:54, 1 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete no independent sources, no claim to notability, just another organization Kraxler (talk) 19:17, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk   11:06, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per nom. Article is unsourced, and neither a google news search or a websearch, returned any results to show the notability.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:23, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - "Zentrum für soziale Entwicklung und Selbsthilfe Perspektive" and Центр "Перспектива" aren't pulling up reliable sources either. This article may require print sources to pass notability requirements. --Djembayz (talk) 17:43, 8 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.