Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centre for Women, Ageing and Media


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete not so much for the copyvio but because the author clearly has made absolutely no attempt to find out what a Wikipedia article should look like. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:08, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Centre for Women, Ageing and Media

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about an organization, copied directly from the organization's own website and sourced exclusively to primary sources which cannot confer notability. Further, the creator asserts on the talk page that she was the original author of the content that's been copied over, so there's a conflict of interest problem here as well. The organization might certainly qualify for a neutrally written article sourced to properly reliable sources, but Wikipedia is not an advertising database on which any organization is entitled to simply repost part or all of its own website without properly demonstrating that it passes any of our inclusion standards. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 22:31, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 13 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete: Just added speedy delete tag for copyright violation. Vrac (talk) 02:02, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - per Bearcat's reasons. Dinky town  talk  04:57, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.