Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centro Gran Caribe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 12:01, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Centro Gran Caribe

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Hell in a Bucket (talk) 18:36, 14 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, the one resource available goes to that business website. Does not meet wp:rs for inclusion on grounds of notability, csd shouldn't have been declined. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 18:38, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 20:53, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 20:53, 14 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Plenty of directory listings, but no non-trivial discussions found. Scant mention of Centro Gran Caribe being a fixture in the local community, but not enough to meet WP:RS.  Note: WP:CSD would not have applied to a shopping mall.  Nominator needs to read carefully the speedy deletion criteria and see that buildings are not covered by this criterion. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 04:32, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * * can you explain what you mean above please? I read A7 and it An article about a real person, an organization (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools), or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. This is distinct from verifiability and reliability of sources, and is a lower standard than notability. "This criterion applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people and organizations themselves, not to articles about their books, albums, software and so on." In this instance they are writting about the business holding the building no? Thats why I fell that A7 was correct. Maybe I;m missing something, Can you please further explain wha you mean and what I did wrong? Hell in a Bucket (talk) 13:43, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.