Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centropolis Entertainment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. DES (talk) 00:18, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Centropolis Entertainment
This article is one in a series of problematic articles by User:Logoboy95 (contribs). While Centropolis is a real movie production company, most of the information in this article is incomprehensible, and the main text is inaccurate. The logo description may be accurate but is unencyclopedic. Delete without prejudice to the creation of a reasonable article about this subject. --Metropolitan90 06:11, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete with without prejudice. But Delete with prejudice for Centropolis_Entertainment_logos.  Regards, Ben Aveling 10:51, 7 December 2005 (UTC)  Sorry, brain disconnect there.  No objections to a decent page being created either now or in the future.  Just this version of the page that does not deserve to live.  Ben Aveling 21:49, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep what on earth is wrong with this? Its notable enough.  Just needs a bit of cleanup. Zordrac  (talk) Wishy Washy  Darwikinian Eventualist 10:54, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I have the distinct feeling it's copied from somewhere based on the user rating and popularity given. - Mgm|(talk) 11:15, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or Clean Up As it stands right now it's just a list of links, most of the other lists referenced are lists of wikipedia articles, which makes a little more sense. DeathThoreau 13:23, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, as Mgm points out, this is almost certainly a copyvio. &mdash; Haeleth Talk 15:57, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep if rewritten as suggested by others.Logophile 09:58, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * What about if it isn't? Being deleted wouldn't mean it can't be recreated.  Regards, Ben Aveling 10:19, 8 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. &mdash;  F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( TALK )  14:17, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. the vandal who created this article has been blocked indefinitely, and the logo is copyrighted. The article can be recreated if needed. See also Articles for deletion/New Regency logos. Mushroom 03:19, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong delete for the logos page and all others like it. Keep the main studio page and cleanup'. --FuriousFreddy 19:42, 12 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.