Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centropy (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 05:42, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Centropy
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

non-notable warez group Ridernyc (talk) 03:50, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 13:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 13:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Centropy was directly referenced by CNET and other sources in regards to their piracy of The Matrix Reloaded. They were among the targets of an eleven nation government operation in Operation Site Down. This operation and its results also were national news: [] - State of Love and Trust (talk) 17:28, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * anything beside WP:ONEEVENT? Ridernyc (talk) 18:50, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm quite certain that I just listed two events. - State of Love and Trust (talk) 03:26, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm quite certain you presented one source in which the total coverage of this group is the following sentence "Among the warez groups targeted are RiSCISO, Myth, TDA, LND, Goodfellaz, Hoodlum, Vengeance, Centropy, Wasted Time, Paranoid, Corrupt, Gamerz, AdmitONE, Hellbound, KGS, BBX, KHG, NOX, NFR, CDZ, TUN and BHP." So you have only presented coverage of one event and this group was only one of many groups.  So even the one event you have provided a source for falls short of significant coverage for this group. Ridernyc (talk) 04:02, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

I don't get what's going on here... if there are seperate articles for Echelon and Kallisto on Wikipedia why shouldn't this be here too? 71.205.46.122 (talk) 00:55, 17 June 2011 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.