Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centurion Life Sciences


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Centurion Life Sciences

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No in-depth coverage, all sources are directory entries. Couldn't find any other coverage online. The first google result (for me) is the linkedin profile of the CEO, who happens to share their name with that of the article's creator... 15 (talk) 20:05, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. 15 (talk) 20:05, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. 15 (talk) 20:05, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails to meet the relevant standard. Likely COI. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 20:35, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: A listing-type article about a consultancy firm, making no claim to notability, and sourced to routine company listings. Nor are searches finding better; fails WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 08:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.