Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Century 22


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. -- Drini 03:42, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Century 22
Apparent vanity page. Not encyclopedic. Delete KleenupKrew 11:17, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not enough for an article, including lack of independent sources for verifiability and notability. Stephen B Streater 11:24, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nomination and Stephen B Streater. --User:BrownHairedGirl (talk • contribs) 13:04, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, part of a walled garden. Stifle (talk) 14:48, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. DarthVad e r 15:08, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as vanity. Funnybunny (talk/QRVS) 15:48, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Stephen B Streater-- blue 520  15:55, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all the above. Gw e rnol 15:56, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. The JPS   talk to me  21:19, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's not nearly enough to define something as an "effort". TheMadBaron 22:24, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable. Wikipedia is not ad space. &mdash;ERcheck @ 00:51, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing but a vain statement of posing. Not notable, not encyclopedic, fails WP:BIO doktorb | words 03:12, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Unnecessary article. Daniel5127, 03:44, 18 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.