Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cephalic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The discussion about making this a redirect can continue on the article's talk page (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:24, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Cephalic

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Soft redirect to wikt:cephalic. It's neither an article nor a disambiguation page. Leo Laursen – ✍ ⌘ 14:40, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 
 * Keep It's more than just a dictionary definition. Mind, it's not likely to get much longer, but we don't delete stuff for being a stub. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 19:25, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Intro is dicdef, one line related to "Cephalon", the rest is disambiguation material. – Leo Laursen – ✍ ⌘ 08:55, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Rename as Cephalon (and rename the company) and expand the subject. 70.51.11.159 (talk) 05:14, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I agree that Cephalon should be about Trilobite or maybe a disambiguation page, I still thinks "Cephalic" should end up as a soft-redirect to Wiktionary. – Leo Laursen – ✍ ⌘ 08:55, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 14:15, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Rename per Leolaursen and have Cephalic redirect there. Tavix (talk) 14:30, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: AFD is for deletion discussions. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 16:21, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Seems to be a valid term and well sourced. At worst a merge with Cephalic_disorders --Banime (talk) 16:28, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment it's an adjective, shouldn't the "noun" form be used as an article title? 70.55.203.112 (talk) 05:26, 22 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.