Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ceragenix Pharmaceuticals


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (non-admin closure)  TheSpecialUser TSU 00:41, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Ceragenix Pharmaceuticals

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable group and the only links I've found are either business profiles or press releases. The only non-press release link I found is this Securities and Exchange Commission page. Among the the press releases are this, this and this. Additionally, this bankruptcy file claim would not be enough to support this article. SwisterTwister  talk  00:38, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. 01:56, 18 August 2012 (UTC)  • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. 01:56, 18 August 2012 (UTC)  • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 18 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Ceragenin, their product. The company is not independently notable, and the product article is much less promotional. --MelanieN (talk) 03:04, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 04:29, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Weak keep per WP:NCORP. A redirect to Ceragenin wouldn't be appropriate because AFAIK the licence could be renegotiated in the future, unless the inventor is linked to the company. Previously named OnSource, also . Maybe there are other more appropriate refs, if anyone feels like trawling through the search results. -- Trevj (talk) 10:51, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 13:59, 1 September 2012 (UTC)




 * Keep – Meets WP:CORPDEPTH per, , . Northamerica1000(talk) 06:42, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.