Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cerebytes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete as crap. Friday (talk) 01:04, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Cerebytes

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced neologism. Probably not notable. Probably self-promoting. Orphaned article. -- jsimlo(talk 15:24, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable neologism. --- RockMFR 16:27, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --EMS | Talk 18:17, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per article: the article states that the term is a neologism. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 22:39, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per above, admitted neologism. -Cquan (don't yell at me...) 00:23, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.