Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cerecor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:46, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Cerecor

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Medgirl131 (creator) with no rationale (despite the fact that I explicitly asked for one in the PROD). As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:54, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:29, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:05, 13 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- no claim to notability & A7 material. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:19, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing ++ 12:25, 16 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.