Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cerelac


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Cerelac

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No references being provided from long time, 2007    Abu Torsam    21:19, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - no sources in the article to establish notability, also I could not find any sources to establish that the product is notable.  GB fan  talk 23:38, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:08, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - This appears to be a major Nestle product. In 2008, it was projected for 1 billion swiss francs in sales.  It has garnered some controversy which includes coverage in books.  A Google news archive search has a large number of hits.  -- Whpq (talk) 14:30, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Strong Keep - Deletion should be based on the quality of the subject and not on the quality of the article itself. That the article is a stub does not mean it is non-notable. Thanks for bringing it to the AfD: Thank you for bringing attention to this article to a broader audience. Kushal (talk) 03:22, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Lack of sources in the article not grounds for deletion, only impossibility of finding sources. No evidence nominator has even attempted to find any. JulesH (talk) 20:03, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: AFD is not cleanup. Buddy431 (talk) 22:14, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.