Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Certain Chapters (Film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was    Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:06, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Certain Chapters (Film)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable per WP:NF. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 19:04, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —PC78 (talk) 11:42, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice. Article reads far too promotionally... which might normally be addressed by proper cleanup and sourcing... but there is simply not much out there. The film was at the Clermont-Ferrand International Short Film Festival in 2008, and was at Sinema Showoff, but nothing else showing notability is to be found.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:59, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. I do not see any reason concerning the deletion of this article. Following are my views on the matter: The article is only explaining what is "Certain Chapters". It shows the content of the short film, a basic plot, and a list for the production credits.  There is no promotional aspect noticeable, except maybe the link to an online CD shop and the article on the director's bio, but if such things were forbidden, an extensive number of other articles on Wiki should be subjected for deletion... This would just be a waste of time for both parties as, in my opinion, the internet is just that; Fact & Fiction.  Moreover, concerning the lack of information; Well isn't it why Wiki has the "edit" option to allow further information to be added later on...  Once more, there is no real reason to delete this article.   2much64u,  11:09, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I am in agreement with you in part, as the terse reason given by the nominator should have read "Fails requirements set out by WP:Notability (film)". I would have loved to have improved the article to make it worthy of inclusion, but wiki requires that the film have some sort of off-wiki notability. All I could find was proof of its screening at those festivals. Wiki needs to have off-wiki reviews or articles about the film in citable sources in order to show its "notability". I looked and could not find them. If you can provide such, I will gladly reverse myself. The links to a filmmakers bio are fine if the article otherwise meets the requirements for inclusion.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 16:57, 13 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:26, 16 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. It has had no coverage. All I can find is one blog post, YouTube videos, Wikipedia pages and their mirrors. Fences and windows (talk) 01:24, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice, per Mike. Can I call you that? Too promotional, damages our credibility.  —  Jake   Wartenberg  16:04, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.