Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Certainty Principle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 22:14, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Certainty Principle
No vote I'm putting this article up for discussion. As far as I can tell, this is original research and has not been published in a peer-reviewed journal. However this is not my field and it requires wider review, hence the AfD Gwernol 16:16, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for now, Wikipedia is not ArXiv, and is not for original research. I read the paper and it seems reasonable enough, but it certainly has not been published in a peer-reviewed journal as of now.  When it has been, this article might have a chance (although of course then there might be a question of notability).--Deville (Talk) 18:16, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I have read eveything here and know a bit about Physics (I am a chemical physicist but chemistry trained). I agree entirely with Deville. --Bduke 22:37, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 03:17, 2 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.