Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Certified Bitcoin Professional (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Under A3 RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:23, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Certified Bitcoin Professional
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article has no references and is essentially only a dictionary definition. Google search shows only that a procedure for the certification exists, and there are no independent articles about the significance of the certification. With no independent coverage, a Wikipedia article is in effect only promoting the examination and certification. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:20, 17 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Consider speedy A3. I actually had it open in another tab and was waiting to see if anything else got added. But as it stands, it's essentially just a restatement of the title. Timothy Joseph Wood  16:25, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment - Nominated once before with the same reasoning. Speedy-deleted as copyright violation.  This version of the article does not appear to be copyright and so can go through deletion discussion.  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:44, 17 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.