Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Certified Forensic Accounting Professional


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:23, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Certified Forensic Accounting Professional

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable certification; the news reports linked in the article either do not mention the certification at all or contain only a PR-like cursory mention without covering it as the primary topic. Other links are articles/quotes by people behind the certification. utcursch | talk 23:22, 25 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. I had PRODed it. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 23:43, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:35, 27 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep This is the certification in the accounting domain.This page gives information about the certification and the topic is such that not every one can afford to speak about the work they are doing. There could be lot of threat for community members to come in media which is considered as the reference here. One should understand the importance of the topic and the sensitivity involved in it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Himugk (talk • contribs) 13:46, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:06, 1 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Himugk: if the subject is so sensitive that it has not been properly discussed in independent sources, it is not ready yet for an article in Wikipedia. הסרפד (Hasirpad) [formerly Ratz...bo] 03:07, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete In principle, I feel this should be one to be saved, if the qualification is indeed as important as claimed, however I am not finding independent discussion of the certification as such. So - without prejudice to future re-creation when it can be verified as having achieved notability - I think it has to be a delete. AllyD (talk)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.