Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cestné a Stavebné Mechanizmy Tisovec


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 00:58, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Cestné a Stavebné Mechanizmy Tisovec

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Deletion was declined in 2007 as supposedly notable but the article is still uncited despite being tagged as needing cites 15 years ago. If the company is any good they ought to be booming nowadays. Chidgk1 (talk) 18:22, 30 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Comment: This Tisovec business directory indicates they’re still in business. When you click on the www.csmtisovec.sk link, it takes you to a custom fabricating shop that makes heavy steel parts and attachments (such as for tractors and excavators) doing business as CSM. That would be a natural business if you were downsizing out of military equipment.
 * — A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 18:59, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:29, 6 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:24, 13 September 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:26, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Companies,  and Slovakia.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:52, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable.
 * This is the previous AfD
 * Articles for deletion/Podpolianske strojárne Detva
 * That AfD was closed as no consensus and the article moved to the current name.
 * I suspect this plant usually just made subassemblies and not complete weapons. “What links here” turns up an unreliably referenced note on a Nazi weapon page that this plant made some unpopular clones in the late 1950s. No other weapons are linked. Given our extensive coverage of Warsaw Pact weapons, we’d have more links if they’d made other finished products. There’s nothing wrong with making subassemblies but they don’t get much press coverage — unlike finished products.
 * — A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 19:19, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.