Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cha Dao Tea Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 11:37, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Cha Dao Tea Company

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Recently founded company with no evidence of better coverage and my searches with the most fruitful results were here and here and although I haven't searched local news sources, it would probably be the same level of low results or maybe a little more but still minor because it's local (though the article's sparse edits suggest it may not be as well known as it actually is). I would've let this article be if it wasn't that sourcing could be better. SwisterTwister  talk  06:50, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:47, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:47, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:47, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - nothing on the search engines shows this to be a notable company. Without an interested editor to provide better sourcing, the best thing is to delete for the time being.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:37, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk  19:27, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Google search reveals only user-generated sources. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 13:13, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable company. We are not a web host for new companies. Bearian (talk)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.