Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chackoism

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Tony Sidaway Talk 13:41, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

Chackoism
Delete. This appears to be original research. Moreover, it doesn't seem to be verifiable at all as it's not sourced and what reference I can find to James George Chacko don't seem to support any of this. It's a particularly long VfD, but it seems like garbage.Mmmbeer 03:16, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless proven otherwise this is original research. As the nom points out, there are no references and Google finds only WP and a mirror. Also, the fact that such a large amount of text was uploaded in a single edit by an anon gives me suspicions of it being an essay or copyvio. -Splash 03:59, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - when I first looked, the only hit in Google was this page itself (mirrors have since picked it up. Was originally non-wikified anonymously contributed. Tenbaset 08:05, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism and probably OR. ManoaChild 22:37, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced - probably original research. Possible hoax article. Zeimusu | (Talk page) 05:54, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism. --Edcolins 10:34, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.