Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chad Castagana


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 07:39, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Chad Castagana

 * – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Biography of living person violates WP:BLP1E. Also authored by a community-banned editor, and is subject to deletion per the banning policy. Wikipedia is not the news. (TWINKLE crapped on me, probably because FAAFA's talk page is a protected redirect, so I had to create the main AfD page from scratch, hope it's right.) - Crockspot 02:19, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not the subject of any significant biography and not known outside of the single event. less notable than Katie Barge also being deleted.  --DHeyward 04:41, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Non-notable.    MortonDevonshire  Yo  · 07:20, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, if necessary rewrite as 2006 fake anthrax letters incident or something similar (a daft solution, IMHO, but apparently it appeases some editors). There are plenty of sources demonstrating WP:N for the incident itself, given that one of the targets is in the line of succession to the Presidency (yes, even last year). --Dhartung | Talk 07:50, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a tabloid aggregator. Delete this and perhaps put a redirect in place to a suitable target. Guy (Help!) 09:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Non notable, if every nut and criminal had a Wikipedia entry, it would be Criminopedia. Torturous Devastating Cudgel 02:29, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm sure David Letterman and the others have had death threats or harassment from various lunatics, and this doesn't mean we create an article for each one. As WP:NOT points out: The fact that someone or something has been in the news for a brief period of time does not automatically justify an encyclopedia article. JungleCat    Shiny! / Oohhh!  02:11, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.