Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chad Dunn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 21:08, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Chad Dunn

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BIO, his achievements are what you would expect from a lawyer. Most of the press coverage are trivial mentions. Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:28, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment the article is created by an obvious WP:SPA. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:30, 2 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete I completely agree. I had actually considered nominating this for AfD a couple days ago, and just hadn't had the time to do a full WP:BEFORE. As mentioned above, the independent and reliable sources are not significant coverage - they only mention him in relation to the cases. Jmertel23 (talk) 14:56, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:46, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:46, 5 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete pretty heavy WP:REFBOMBing but upon closer look Dunn isn't really ever the (or even a) focal point in the reliable sources used. Best, GPL93 (talk) 04:58, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Minor coverage does not meet notability guidelines. Reads like a resumé for a typical attorney. Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 07:39, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, Fails WP:GNG He is just like any other attorney no sign of notability. Alex-h (talk) 11:20, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per User:Bearian/Standards of attorneys. I note that ATLA is a fairly small organization, about the size or a medium-sized state's bar association. While he's done great work, many lawyers have done similar court work. Bearian (talk) 22:36, 6 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.