Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chad Kultgen (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Chad Kultgen
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The subject fails WP:BIO. There's only one reliable source here that covers him in any detail, a NYT piece. The rest are all either reviews of his books, or minor article about being sued over a podcast. One or more of his books could possibly be considered notable, but notability is not inherited, so those articles need to be created separately. Also note this was deleted back in 2011 and re-created in 2012. I haven't seen the deleted version as the history is not merged. Iggy pop goes the weasel (talk) 18:52, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Washington. Shellwood (talk) 19:00, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Journalism.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:03, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Seems to pass AUTHOR with reviews, . With the NY Times article, I think we're ok for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 01:09, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: Plenty of articles about the George Carlin AI special, mentioning this person, and the lawsuit involved. Depending how it goes, could either be famous or infamous. Oaktree b (talk) 01:15, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: widespread, active coverage going on with George Carlin. She was  a fairy 02:45, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep There's only one reliable source here that covers him in any detail, a NYT piece. is evidence of a BEFORE failure; the NYT so rarely writes about people that no other RS is covering, the more prudent move is to assume you've missed something else and keep looking. Jclemens (talk) 05:52, 21 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.