Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chad Mansley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  09:15, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Chad Mansley

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Articles fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 21:16, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 21:16, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 21:16, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 21:16, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:47, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - User has nominated/proposed around 25 articles for deletion (almost all related to Australia/Oceania and that they didn't create) in a very short amount of time (see User_talk:Simione001). There is coverage like, , and other offline coverage, having played in fully pro English League Two and Australian top flight in early 2000s. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 21:49, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment - I have only nominated 6 articles today. These 3 references simply do not satisfy WP:GNG. One is about him not getting offered a contract after a trial, i mean really? Simione001 (talk) 22:03, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: is sourcing sufficient or not? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  18:31, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Comments I am not sure, if you should put Newcastle Jets down or the previous incarnation names., he was listed in this history article , but don't know more about his role at the club during the time. There is too much WP:ROUTINE and that is concerning, I don't think I see a GNG pass regardless of the A League and fully pro league games in the English league, somewhat concerning. Govvy (talk) 09:21, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. First link above does not even work. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 10:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep passes GNG With coverage above.--Ortizesp (talk) 09:28, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of  in . The odd passing mention is not enough to establish notability. The first reference given above returns nothing, and is not even on the Wayback Machine. Fails GNG.  Springnuts (talk) 11:08, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment on sufficiency of sourcing - insufficient imo as above: lack of . Springnuts (talk) 18:41, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources are not sufficient to meet GNG. The three provided above, the first one leads to a dead end, second one mentions the subject once and the third one pulls up a database. Not enough for SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:34, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep, the article has several sources that deal with the subject in detail. Hack (talk) 02:28, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment -, , , many sources have been added to the article. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 20:50, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources which show notability. GiantSnowman 21:55, 2 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.