Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chadwick Airport (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not notable per WP:NAIRPORT. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 21:28, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Chadwick Airport
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

AFD in 2008 was kept based on the falsehood that all airports are inherently notable. To even call this an "airport" is a stretch: it's just a strip of grass where a small plane can land in someone's (Mr. Edward Chadwick's) backyard! There is no public access and no substantive sources to warrant an article. Reywas92Talk 20:43, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Oregon. Reywas92Talk 20:43, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete not even remotely close to being notable. Not every place that has in some way a name is notable, especially when it is a private and not a public place. What next, will we create articles on every driveway?John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:50, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Airports are not inherently notable. Per WP:NAIRPORT "The basic notability requirement still applies. Significant, independent and reliable sources specifically about the airport must exist." Fails WP:SIGCOV. AusLondonder (talk) 02:31, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Run-of-the-mill private airport lacking zero notability on anything but a local level, if that.TH1980 (talk) 04:15, 23 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.