Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chadwick Pelletier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Those against deletion have not shown significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources to meet the general notability guideline. Olaf Davis (talk) 16:10, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Chadwick Pelletier

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

promotional article for a very minor film writer, actor, and producer. No significant films in any of these functions, except one performance in someone else's music video.

The article manages to include three photos of him, and all his very minor credits. Perhaps it's a lead up to his unpublished book?  DGG ( talk ) 04:11, 21 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Vanity article. No credible assertion of notability, nor can I find any significant mentions.TheLongTone (talk) 07:37, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 21 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per TheLongTone. Also, the images are most likely a fan upload, they are missing permissions. LADY LOTUS • TALK 17:39, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment I'd also like to add that the original creator of this article is now blocked. LADY LOTUS • TALK 17:44, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Individual has extensive credits with major networks according to referenced Wiki article (IMDb). There is no direct promotion on this page; only outlining the individual's work in and out of his industry, which is appropriate and inline with this medium. Companies referenced in this article all have relevant industry credits and images seem to link back to Wiki Media with associated permissions, and are relevant to article. TALK 17:39, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment per Lady Lotus' comment. The creator of the article was blocked, because his/her username did not follow Wikipedia contributor guidelines and represented an organization.  I don't sense any dubious play here.  Article is informative and relevant to this database. TALK 17:44, 21 April 2014 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spycraft7 (talk • contribs)
 * Keep This is not a vanity article. Individual has credits on just about every major network, and is the owner and founder of successful industry production and development companies. I am a contributor to this article and have done extensive due diligence and open source research on this individual to find and cross-reference much of what is found in this article.  Many people who saw this person on MTV's Road Rules are not aware of his background and work, which is why the article (I believe) was created.  He's appeared on national TV; he's been in a number of published and produced TV, commercial and print campaigns, with many assertions of notability.  He was also a well-known voiceover artist on the Award-Winning animated series, Where on Earth is Carmen Sandiego, and also has a YA Fiction novel due this year.  I believe his credits are worthy of a wikipedia page. I say keep. Cwick37 (talk) 07:57, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Just another quick comment. Many of Chadwick's MTV Road Rules cast members who have articles here, with significantly fewer professional credits and no issues. TALK 20:17, 21 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment IMDb cannot be used as a reliable source, and having notability is having "significant coverage" of a person, which he does not have. Also, it's written like a fansite. "Notable quotes", really? And all these links (now removed) to direct a user to imdb, not even used a reference. No. It's written poorly when he shouldn't have a page to begin with. And why do users Cwick37 and Spycraft7 have the same exact signature effect? Not socking I hope. LADY LOTUS • TALK 11:39, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment I'd also like to add that the 3 pictures (now removed) that were on this page are all uploaded User:Cwick37 as "own work" with missing permission. Likely a fan, so I'd be cautious of the motive to keep the article. LADY LOTUS • TALK 11:43, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG. No significant coverage from reliable third-party sources. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 13:31, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment If the page is deleted, it's deleted, although as one of its contributors, I will say that his credentials (although not a celebrity), significantly outweigh many of his Reality TV peers, who have their own articles here with no issues, to include: Tori Fiorenza, Evan Starkman, Julie Stoffer, Tonya Cooley, Brianna Taylor, Diem Brown, Christina Pazsitzky, among many others. Chadwick is an industry professional with verifiable credentials, although I'm sure if he ever got wind of all this hubbub, he'd rather it just come down.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cwick37 (talk • contribs) 17:17, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment just listing other pages that "own articles here with no issues" is just WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS and isn't a valid argument in AfD discussions. We're talking about him, not them. LADY LOTUS • TALK 19:50, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.