Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chah-e Akrami


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:43, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Chah-e Akrami

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Mass-created Iran geostub by User:Carlossuarez46. The name contains chah (چاه, well), and the geocoordinates go to a subdivision of Yazd called Akramiyeh. Not sure if this subdivision meets WP:NGEO. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 22:21, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Iran. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 22:21, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GEOLAND#1, WP:GNG. Not a populated legally-recognised community but instead just a reference point used in the census. And honestly, we should just delete all of the "Chah" Iranian village stubs, since they all likely are just wells used as reference points in the census - here's a search that shows that there's about 300 of them, all of them stubs, all sourced to GEONet Names Server and/or the Iranian Census (both unreliable sources for whether a place is a legally recognised populated place). WP:BUNDLE is appropriate in the case of a single editor creating near-identical failing hoax/spam articles, wand that is surely the case here. FOARP (talk) 09:02, 27 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.