Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaim Gebber


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tim Song (talk) 02:06, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Chaim Gebber

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable dance teacher. No reliable sources to back up claim that caused A7 speedy deletion to be declined. Gigs (talk) 17:46, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  -- --Darkwind (talk) 18:21, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- --Darkwind (talk) 18:22, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol merge vote.svg|15px]][[Image:Symbol redirect vote.svg|15px]] Merge/redirect — No WP:N, no WP:RS. Wish WP:CSD went through.  m o ɳ o  00:16, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * What is "undefined"? I think your script is broken. As an aside, the community has rejected images in !votes as well.  I'll let the maintainer know. Gigs (talk) 01:29, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * at least a + or a - I can understand, but I cannot decipher these symbols.  DGG ( talk ) 05:20, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I will re-write the script for myself.-- m o ɳ o 23:46, 12 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: I intend to rescue this article; the independent sources have recently been deleted, along with some very reasonable claims of notability. Unfortunately, the wording was one-to-one from Gebber's web site and had to go, but I think I could could rewrite that in a way the sources support. (Folks, please have a look at the page history before nominating) --Pgallert (talk) 12:06, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Recreated what was there and put into different wording. However, I could not find any external support for the main claim of "best choreography" in 1993, and the CityFu source is shady. All that remains is one article about him in the Shanghai Daily, not sure if this is sufficient. --Pgallert (talk) 12:32, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Be careful. The old material is a close paraphrase of, bordering on copyright violation.  I considered restoring it myself before nominating it for AfD but then I saw it was copied from there. Gigs (talk) 13:09, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure, I see what you mean. But as it is similarly close to the external sources you cannot really say if perhaps Gebber put it on his web site after the newspaper article appeared. I see it as an example of the difficult question of "Who copied from whom? --Pgallert (talk) 14:17, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant coverage.  — fetch ·  comms   00:44, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.