Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep. No one wants this deleted, thank goodness. As it is, we have a 60% vote for merge, but I'm going to exercise a bit of discretion here -- the Chairman is a very important person, and a frequent spokesperson for the US military. In my view, Jayzel's points are well-taken, so I'll keep outright. Xoloz 14:52, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
this article is a almost exact duplicate of what is already written in Joint Chiefs of Staff A mon avis, there is no point in having two articles listing the same things. Knows it all 08:47, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect per what seems to be already happening anyway Ydam 10:25, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect, the article name is useful for searches, but the content is just duped without good reason. If the original Joint Chiefs of Staff article grows too large, it can always been unredirected. To the nominator, I suggest you withdraw your nomination of this article for the time being and go ahead and merge redirect it youself, but it's your choice. - Motor (talk) 12:21, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect per Motor. jgp (T|C) 17:51, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete, this is an informative article and should be keept so that more info can be added to it. Rockfan1 21:29, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep as is. If anything, the Joint Chiefs of staff section dealing with the chairman should be re-written in summary stlye with a link to this article. This is the top military position in the U.S. army. To delete or merge it would be like merging President of the United States with Federal government of the United States just because there is some duplication of information. --Jayzel 02:00, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.