Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaitanya Chinchlikar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete (comment added subsequently to represent the actual close. Lourdes  06:24, 7 March 2017 (UTC)) The result was Procedural Close. G11-ed by. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 12:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Chaitanya Chinchlikar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No reliable independent sources, unable to establish notability, appears to be vanity biography WWGB (talk) 03:21, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Have been listed as a Notable Alumni by my College - Sydenham College of Commerce & Economics. Have several articles quoting me for subjects related to Education, Film, Media & Animation education. Vice President of India's premier Film & Media institute. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chait123 (talk • contribs) 03:25, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lots of interviews. Even quoted in publications like Knowledge@Wharton. No coverage on the subject though. Lourdes  04:39, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Vanity page of non-notable. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:51, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete when the coverage of a journalist has to come from their personal wordpress blog they are generally non-notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:55, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually he seems more a consultant, PR person and part-time teacher. Nothing in this suggests notability. One rule for Wikipedia, if you have to be the one to create an article on yourself and to try to oppose its deletion, you are not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:57, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:48, 5 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as G11, User:Chait123 who created the article is almost certainly the subject in the BLP article.Ajf773 (talk) 07:56, 5 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.