Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaithanya public school


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:46, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Chaithanya public school

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Could not trace any existence of the school online. Do not meet WP:GNG. Amartyabag  TALK2ME  11:03, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment I found it in 30 seconds. http://www.chaithanyaschool.com/ Dimspace (talk) 13:36, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Although the article is just a straight copy and paste from their site. Either needs site link adding, but probably still falls within criteria for deletion Dimspace (talk) 13:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment. The article is no longer a copyvio. It's just a stub now. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs)  16:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs)  16:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment. Works fine now. Perfectly acceptable stub to valid school. No reason to delete Dimspace (talk) 16:49, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. The school's website indicates this is a PreK–8 school. While existence and copyvio issues have been resolved, is this school notable? Also, please note that there are multiple schools by this name in India in case anyone suggests redirecting. • Gene93k (talk) 20:32, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication that this meets or ever could meet notability guidelines. Elementary and middle schools rarely meet notability guidelines and there is no evidence that this one is any different.--RadioFan (talk) 22:13, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theo polisme  14:51, 24 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. I was going to suggest a redirect to Katipalla per usual treatment for lower schools, but Gene93k makes a valid point about the name not being unique. --MelanieN (talk) 00:38, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.