Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chak 29 D. W. D.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 23:24, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Chak 29 D. W. D.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lack of notability Bromley86 (talk) 21:00, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Withdrawn by nominator - wasn't aware of WP:GEOLAND. Bromley86 (talk) 14:46, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:29, 9 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep -recognized geographical places are considered notable for inclusion on Wikipedia per WP:GEOLAND. The village name is however, somewhat inaccurate. It is just "29 DWD" that shows up in census directory and here. Weird name? Yes, never heard of such villages name as they have in Rajasthan. Expanded the article in the meanwhile. Geographical articles should generally not be brought at afd unless they are made up or irreparable. I argue to withdraw.  Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  14:21, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * FYI -I've moved the village to its correct title as per WP:COMMONNAME, to "29 DWD". There are no mention of 'Chak' anywhere.  Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  14:29, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks Anupmehra. I think I've withdrawn it correctly.  Bromley86 (talk) 15:34, 13 December 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.