Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chakowili


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Kambon-waa. czar 04:21, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Chakowili

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Very minimal aspect of a specific warrior dance. Only source (two given sources are the same) is a MA thesis, not a WP:RS (per WP:SCHOLARSHIP). No other sources could be found (apart from the same author giving a summary of his thesis in "Ethnomusicology Review"), no books discuss or mention this. I redirected it to Kambon-waa, but this was objected against by the creator of both these articles. I have no objection to a "redirect" outcome for this AfD, I list if here per the WP:BEFORE indication for controversial redirects. Fram (talk) 12:43, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 12:43, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 12:43, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 12:43, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:14, 4 August 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 01:48, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge into Kambon-waa, this does not justify its own article at all. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 03:45, 11 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.