Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChalkZone characters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, in some form or another. There are valid rationales given for merging this into one article or one descriptive list. That's a matter for interested parties to go to the talkpages to gather consensus one way or the other, not AfD. Keeper  |   76   |   Disclaimer  19:00, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

ChalkZone characters


Non-notable characters, articles fail WP:FICT and WP:N. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 03:24, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete all, not notable outside the ChalkZone universe. Nothing but fancruft here. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:33, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment don't forget about the arbcom temporary injunction. Blast Ulna (talk) 04:22, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to ChalkZone or delete all. The main article already contains the voices, and the articles are just WP:NOT otherwise, with little chance for encyclopedic expansion. I note that List of chalk characters from ChalkZone, which is a stubby list, could be included in this AfD as well, or may serve as a merge target. – sgeureka t•c 08:30, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep nomination relies on Wikipedia jargon. Obvious redirect targets. Catchpole (talk) 17:27, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 21:39, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 10:11, 28 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment Since when are policy or guidelines dismissed as "jargon"? Links to the relevant guidelines are provided in the nominator's rationale. That's not "jargon", that's saving space in a discussion. Do you really want the entire guideline posted in every AfD where it is invoked? Your "keep" opinion has nothing to do with the article or the guidelines it may or not fail. DarkAudit (talk) 16:27, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to ChalkZone. Does this mean that that injunction has been lifted?  If so, break out the erasers on this one. Mandsford (talk) 22:11, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment since all we can do now is discuss it, the first one at least would appear to be a major character in a continuing series and thus appropriate for her own article.DGG (talk) 17:29, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   —Pixelface (talk) 23:36, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   —Pixelface (talk) 23:37, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge - Just as a note, the first character is actually a boy. Anyway, the only information in the article is about different episodes the character appeared in and what the plot of that episode was. These articles, since they are both short and unnecessary, should be merged into the main ChalkZone article. Parent5446(Murder me for my actions) 23:57, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Jerry   talk ¤ count/logs 04:39, 7 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - violating Arbitration decisions with nominations suggests a severe lack of good judgement on the part of the nominator; probably a good idea to remove all their deletion nominations and keep them from nominating any more for a suitable period of time - David Gerard (talk) 13:32, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and merge info along with List of chalk characters from ChalkZone into List of ChalkZone characters then redirect the articles. They are reasonable search terms and redirects are cheap.  Ursasapien (talk) 09:52, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge, Lists are better anyway. Blast Ulna (talk) 11:58, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and start a merge discussion. --Pixelface (talk) 14:59, 12 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.